Wall Street Strategies
Hello! Sign in or Register


Question of the Week

There is the Trump–Powell riff. Such battles are not unusual despite the media's coverage, and there are more legal authorities who believe Trump can terminate Powell.

The question is, would it be smart?

I worry about the timing but would love to hear your thoughts.
Post your answer below.

Morning Commentary

LONG WEEK

By Charles Payne, CEO & Principal Analyst
4/21/2025 9:44 AM

Friday proved to be a solid session, made even more impressive ahead of a three-day weekend.

Factors

Green was present across most factors, with the strongest performance in small revenue names. That’s somewhat peculiar, but there is a treasure hunt going on, and nothing looks cheaper than quality small-cap names.

Living with Uncertainty

We entered the weekend with record-shattering uncertainty in several areas, including economic, trade, and fiscal policy.

Fear Ebbing

The Fear Gauge is pulling back but remains elevated to the point that many say it guarantees more weakness. I don’t buy that, but looking at all metrics and gauges is important.

This is going to be a long week. I’m hoping for greater clarity from the White House.

Today’s Session

The market opened under pressure from several sources.

Huawei will reportedly produce an AI chip that is supposedly capable of replacing Nvidia's (NVDA) H20 chips. It's doubtful they will be a pure replacement, but the news is pressuring shares of NVDA.

On the tariff front, there is lots of saber rattling. 

China is threatening nations.

Japan is saying it won’t totally surrender (this is actually a sign they are going to give in and make some compromises).

JAPAN WON’T YIELD TO ALL U.S. DEMANDS, ISHIBA SAYS

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba pushed back against U.S. pressure on trade, saying Japan, “won’t be able to secure our national interest,” if it concedes everything.  With the U.S. seeking more access to Japan’s auto and agriculture markets, Ishiba defended barriers protecting local farmers and said Tokyo wouldn’t rush into a deal just to ease Trump’s tariffs. Negotiators are prepping for a second round of talks before the end of April.

And then there’s the Trump–Powell riff. Such battles are not unusual despite the media’s coverage, and there are more legal authorities who believe Trump can terminate Powell. I worry about the timing.


Comments
The Irritable Powell Syndrome, (IPS) 💩💩💩 has to be reigned in. His commentary is political rather than professional and that adversely impacts all investors from the little guy with a very modest 401K retirement fund to the major corporations. There’s no room for IPS in this recovery.

Terry Lavis on 4/21/2025 8:55:38 AM
If Powell had an ounce of objective decency and the brains for which everyone credits him, he'd save everyone further angst and resign. Then he can leave the stage reputation reasonably intact and insulated for what happens for the rest of this year.

Yossarian on 4/21/2025 10:49:19 AM
Clearly Powell has been a Biden and Democratic supporter from the start, instead of fighting President Trump he should try and understand the small investors that are affected by his irrisponsible commentary.

James Hanson on 4/21/2025 10:51:48 AM
I consider Powell similar to President Trump in that he says what he is thinking. At times it can be frustrating. But replacing Powell at this point will just bring more uncertainty and fear of the unknown. Not the time to fire Powell.

P. Krueger on 4/21/2025 11:09:13 AM
Dumping or keeping Powell is probably a lose/lose proposition already, unfortunately. The fear mongers will keep running their campaign either way, so it's up to the calmer voices, like Charles', to keep elucidating the tangible facts.

Russ D on 4/21/2025 11:48:46 AM
I would replace Powell. However I would not do so abruptly. First I would state who I would like as Powell’s replacement and then give the market time to digest that and observe the market’s reaction. Then I would make a case for firing him. 1. Being late to react to Biden’s inflation boom calling it transitory 2. Acting politically by cutting rates by 50 bps prior to the election when economic data didn’t seem to warrant it. And Finally basing Fed policy on what might result from Trump’s tariff policy while he invests that he is data dependent.

Fred S on 4/21/2025 12:52:09 PM
Let Powell serve out his term

Robert Aubry on 4/21/2025 1:13:35 PM
Trump will need someone to blame if there is a recession so keeping Powell around will accomplish that purpose.

Allen F on 4/21/2025 2:30:11 PM
The political bias at the Fed is disgusting and the perfect reason to terminate JPow and end the Fed. Ron Paul had it right along with a number of others including Phillies pitcher and Senator Jim Bunning.

Peter K on 4/22/2025 4:18:07 AM
Jerome Powell is a dangerous perverse (= sadistic) psychopath and shouldn't even be on the loose, even less with ANY kind of responsibility - like Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Fauci, to name only a few dangerous lunatics in power in the recent past...
Please inform President Trump before he caves in to pressure from unsuspecting small investors who only see their short term gains.
As Scott Bessent said: "It's been Wall Street's turn in the past two years. Now it's Main Street's turn!". Amen.


John Smith on 4/23/2025 12:46:10 PM
 

Log In To Add Your Comment


Home | Products & Services | Education | In The Media | Help | About Us |
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use |
All Rights Reserved.

 

×