Wall Street Strategies
Hello! Sign in or Register


Question of the Week

What’s the best way to stop U.S. jobs from going overseas?
Trade war with massive tariffs
Punish individual companies that send jobs out of the United States
Change our tax policies and reduce fees and regulations

Morning Commentary

Saving Manufacturing

By Charles Payne, CEO & Principal Analyst
2/16/2016 9:30 AM

As the U.S. economy continues its sub-par recovery, there are more hits to the manufacturing sector, which has bled jobs for years.  In the 1940s, 40% of all jobs were in manufacturing.  Today, it is less than 10%, and dwindling even faster.  Last week, Carrier Corporation, a unit of United Technologies (UTX) announced that 2,100 factory jobs in Indianapolis would move to Mexico over the next few years.  It was a huge blow for workers and their families, and it was caught on video.

The news even made the GOP debate last Saturday; a topic that will resonate this November.

Carrier points the finger at the factory workers union, United Steelworkers Local 1999, which didn’t offer enough concessions.

Dollars & Sense & Patriotism

 

 Embedded image permalinkAlthough our manufacturing sector has been decimated, it’s still a very important part of the economy.  In fact, in the third quarter of last year, only Information and Business Services added more value as a percentage of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

It’s about the bottom line, however.  Workers at the Carrier factory are broken into two categories:

$14/hour or $30,000 year

$26/hour or $50,000 year

Can you guess who is losing their jobs?

 

 

Sucking Sound

Mexican Immigrant Population in the U.S. in Decline

Americans should be upset about jobs leaving the nation, but how do we remedy this in a way that doesn’t backfire on trade or consumers?

Well, for one thing, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) wasn’t a good deal; more recently, allowing Mexican drivers to pull long hauls in America is only going to make the deal even worse.

Then, there are regulations.

In a piece from Indiana government (IN. gov),  it points out that economists John Dawson and John Seater estimate that accumulated federal regulations have stunted the Gross National Product (GNP) by nearly $40 trillion in 2011 alone.

The national GDP for 2011 was just shy of $15 trillion.  This means the national GNP would have been closer to $55 trillion.

The math is shocking.  These regulations divide into an annual loss of about $277,100 per household and $129,300 per person.  In the meantime, there’s been an intriguing phenomenon of Mexican immigrants leaving the United States (see chart), which underscores just how weak our recovery has been.  I know these are big political issues and I worry about the remedy for them.  There are smart tariffs, but not individual wars on individual companies.  However, before we begin to blame Mexico, we need to make American more hospitable to businesses, although I do not think unions are going to make sacrifices commensurate with economic conditions.  Let’s at least roll back the taxes, fees, and regulations.

Technical View

Last week, the Dow and oil held at perfect double bottoms (on closing basis), but the real test comes at 16.500, which is a long ways off.  Most of the Street is looking for that key support number to fail soon, which actually makes me think that maybe it won’t or there could be a big rally before.  There’s a major gap above 17,500, but it’s a pipe dream to think it could be filled this week.

Today’s Session

Equity futures have been higher for the past 48 hours and got a boost in terms of conviction from a tentative deal forged between Russia, Saudi Arabia and Qatar that calls for a freeze in production at January levels.  It’s the first deal between OPEC and non-OPEC nations. There are issues, including the fact Iran isn’t part of the deal, and this is a freeze not a cut.

China was higher overnight, but not the Shanghai, which is on the wrong side of 3,000 and needs to clear that pivotal swing point to regain any upside momentum.

 

 


Comments
"...accumulated federal regulations have stunted the Gross National Product (GNP) by nearly $40 trillion in 2011 alone." It's hard to grasp that this is possible. Charles, can you please expand on this revelation in a future column?

Jim S on 2/16/2016 10:02:11 AM
I think the U.S. Congress should change tax policies to help small and medium size businesses.

John Wiley Jr on 2/16/2016 10:15:54 AM
Changing our regulations would be the biggest boost for our economy but also changing our high tax rate would cause these companies to stay better than starting a trade war. A new administration COULD revisit every regulation and change the worst of them.

Frank on 2/16/2016 10:32:13 AM
The best way to stop jobs going overseas is obvious... it is massive tariffs. That will surely kill the economy and hiring, so there will not be any jobs to ship overseas.

It is the Demon-cratic way to create equality. Kill all prosperity and everyone is equally poor.

Bob G on 2/16/2016 11:09:02 AM
We need to recognize and identify which jobs actually are better done in the US and develop them.

Patricia Flynn on 2/16/2016 11:21:51 AM
If we want jobs to stay here, then lowering the cost of those jobs is the way to go.

First, the huge increases in taxes, especially Medicare's >50% increase, are not helping.

Perhaps the programs for giving money and food stamps to lazy bums (and a very few truly needy people) can be modified to be have subsidies gradually phased in at controlled levels to make U.S. employment more attractive. This would be in the form of government subsidies for jobs, and would both hit the socialist ideal of redistribution while being practical in that it creates jobs instead of killing jobs.

Of course, this would necessitate the breaking of union power. Otherwise, all the benefits would vaporize as the union bosses lined their own pockets just like the colleges have enriched themselves at the cost of students by scamming all the money put into student aid.

Bob G on 2/16/2016 11:25:21 AM
This seems so obvious yet...
Our gov't policies should be akin to kindergarten - incent the behavior wanted. Do you punish or reward? Reward usually gets better results, cooperation, and long term compliance rather than circumventing punishing rules.

Scott Heck on 2/16/2016 12:05:39 PM
Not long ago, I attended a public function at which (then) Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack was in attendance. I approached her to URGE her to ask Congress for some relief for small businessmen, such as myself...to which she shunned me off to her lessor associate who spent all of 45-seconds with me, telling me to contact him at their regional Congressional office and then he QUICKLY moved on. I HATE being patronized and THUS...I was one among MANY who did NOT vote for Mrs. Bono-Mack. Guess where she serves TODAY?

James Allan on 2/16/2016 12:28:55 PM
The self anointed disdain "dirty" manufacturing jobs. They have envisioned a world where the US labor force will consist of white collar administrators and computer programmers. The necessary sequelle of this dream is a ever increasing unemployed class made up of those who used to work with their hands. Note to self...that does not work!

Scott Manhart on 2/16/2016 1:37:08 PM
The primary things making U.S. manufacturing uncompetitive with China etc. is the U.S. corporate tax rate, the highest in the western world, and energy costs. Fracking etc. has tremendously lowered energy costs in the U.S. If the corporate tax rates were reasonable the U.S could compete with any country in the world. We also need to address the currency issue in China. If the Chinese don't cooperate and let their currency float to where it should be the U.S does need to impose tariffs on imports from China. This is not protectionism but rather doing what is necessary to maintain a level playing to allow the U.S manufacturing sector to compete globally.

Fred Spellman on 2/16/2016 1:43:57 PM
Taxes are a big factor but, also the bureaucracy and regulations are cumbersome. We need good regulations but, the duplication of paperwork across a myriad of agencies and bureaucratic agencies add lots of unnecessary cost and delays. Even getting a new business off the ground is a laborious process. redundancies.
Democrats want to talk about jobs but they do not want to fix the issues that inhibit job creations. They had rather Tax and existing entity and then use the proceeds to create make work jobs.
Regardless of Democratic rhetoric about the middle class and wage disparity they are a major drag on progress in both areas.

Garro on 2/16/2016 4:29:01 PM
It is not only shipping the jobs out of America but we are loosing the critical innovative and technological connection between design and manufacturing. We are giving away our ability to produce goods that give value to our economy.

Larry Leonard on 2/17/2016 1:38:46 PM
The Federal Government should facilitate behavior in their policies by reducing taxes and giving incentives to invest.

Michael Baselice on 2/17/2016 6:55:14 PM
I assume if a US company makes more profit in the US it will stay however the future must look stable regarding taxes, fees and regulations that's why we need a conservative republican president.

Charles Mansur on 2/17/2016 8:40:54 PM
The only thing certain in business is government regulation and taxes.

J. W. on 2/18/2016 12:09:23 PM
how can the US send 500 billion dollars to China every year as trade profit except as bribe money to the commeys. Also other countries japan, and others. interests that are power elete. one world gov. the president seems to be one


greg s. on 2/19/2016 1:21:44 AM
some job losses are inevitable as the US economy transitions from manufacturing to service oriented

Dr Siby Sebastian on 2/21/2016 6:07:41 AM
 

Log In To Add Your Comment


Home | Products & Services | Education | In The Media | Help | About Us |
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use |
All Rights Reserved.

 

×